作者指导

On 2023年2月10日美国国立卫生研究院发布了指南通知不是- od - 23 - 057 鼓励将到达要点10. 到达表示 basic minimum to include in any manuscript, 尤其是涉及到动物的时候, to ensure readers and reviewers can assess the reliability of the reported findings.

In the spirit of the Catholic intellectual tradition that informs UIW’s mission, faculty and students support each other in the search for and communication of truth. UIW’s mission compels us to accept responsibility for the ethical communication of our scholarly inquiries in a manner that respects the dignity and rights of all participants who con致敬 to our shared intellectual journey. The following guidelines are offered to help authors be aware of their responsibilities with regard to the communication and publication of scholarly work.

作者标准

一般来说, criteria for authorship should be based on the accepted practice in the relevant discipline and the guidance of the specific publisher or journal.

The following criteria are provided for guidance:

Each individual listed as an author should have con致敬d substantially to the scholarly work. Examples of activities considered to be a substantial contribution may include the conception of the project, 项目设计, 实验设计, 数据收集, 分析, 和/或解释.
An author should be able to articulate their contribution to the scholarly work and explain how it relates to the entire project.
Individuals who con致敬 solely to general supervision, 资金, or collecting data generally do not sufficiently satisfy the criteria for authorship.

The following are examples of situations that are generally considered to be a breach of appropriate authorship:

Intentional exclusion of a person as an author

Intentionally excluding someone who has con致敬d to the work aligns with authorship criteria.

强制性的作者

Typically consists of a senior researcher forcing a junior researcher to include another individual that did not con致敬 to the work as an author.

名誉作者

Granting authorship to an individual who has not appropriately con致敬d to the work, 出于欣赏或尊重, or with the belief that the honored individual will increase the likelihood of publication, 信誉, 或状态.

礼物作者

Offering authorship as a credit or sense of obligation, 致敬, or dependence with the belief of an anticipated benefit to an individual who has not appropriately con致敬d to work.

鬼作者

Failing to identify as an author someone who has made substantial contributions to the research or writing of a manuscript thus meriting authorship or allowing significant editorial control of a publication by an unnamed party, which may constitute a real or perceived conflict of interest that should be dis关闭d.

致谢

Individuals who do not meet the criteria for authorship, but have provided valuable contributions to the work, should be acknowledged for their contributing role. Examples of those that con致敬 may include staff, 编辑助理, 技术援助, or other individuals that provide valuable contributions to the writing, 编辑, 数据收集, 或者获得资金.

In all scientific and scholarly publications and all manuscripts submitted for publication, 应确认资金来源. This includes but is not limited to: Grants (internal and external), 合同, gift support and technical or other help if it is meaningful to the completion of the project.

分配作者

Discussion of authorship and order of authors should take place early in the development of the project, 定期接受检查.

The primary author should assure the following:

Each author meets the criteria for authorship, according to the relevant disciplinary standards and/or publisher’s criteria.
Each author has reviewed the entire scholarly work.
Each author has consented to authorship prior to submission of the work for publication or presentation.

Authors should attempt to resolve authorship disputes themselves. If disputes cannot be settled they should be referred to a third party (such as a department chair or Dean) for resolution.